Wilshire Insurance v. Sentry Select Insurance

Good Law
124 Cal. App. 4th 27
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 15, 2004No. G033136California3,331 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Ikola, J.

On cross-motions for summary judgment, the court applied Insurance Code, section 11580.9, subdivision (d), 1 and declared Wilshire Insurance Company, Inc. (Wilshire) entitled to contribution from Sentry Select Insurance Company (Sentry) 2 in the amount of one-half the expenses incurred by Wilshire in defending and settling a wrongful death action. Sentry appeals the judgment arguing the statute does not apply to the stipulated facts, but if it does, it was misapplied. Finding no error, we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Because the parties based their respective motions for summary judgment on a joint statement of stipulated facts, we confine our summary of the facts to the matters contained in their stipulation, including the exhibits.

The Accident and the Underlying Litigation

In July 1999, Ken Holm, doing business as Kenway Enterprises (Kenway), was driving a 1989 Kenworth tractor (the tractor) hauling a 1981 Great Dane semi-trailer (the trailer) when the tractor-trailer rig was involved in an accident causing bodily injury and death. A wrongful death action was filed in the Orange County Superior Court against, inter alia, Kenway (the owner of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.