Daun

Daun v. USAA Casualty Insurance

Good Law
125 Cal. App. 4th 599·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 2·2005 Daily Journal DAR 130·23 Cal. Rptr. 3d 44·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 99
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 2005No. D043793California2,859 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

McIntyre, J.

In this appeal we address the question of whether the California uninsured motorist statute (Ins. Code, § 11580.2) allows an insurer to properly exclude uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage where the insured is injured by an uninsured motorist or underinsured motorist while the insured operated a motor vehicle with less than four wheels. (All undesignated statutory references are to the Insurance Code.) We conclude this exclusion contravenes public policy because it impermissibly narrows the scope of UM and UIM coverage and we therefore reverse the judgment in favor of the insurer.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The following facts are undisputed: A vehicle driven by an UIM struck Robert W. Daun while he was riding a two-wheeled motorcycle owned by the City of San Diego and furnished to him for his regular use as a police officer. Daun did not own or lease the motorcycle and he was acting within the course and scope of his employment at the time of the accident. USAA Casualty Insurance Company (USAA) had issued Daun an automobile insurance policy that included UM and UIM coverage; however, Daun did not include the motorcycle as an insured vehicle under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.