Kleemann

Kleemann v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

Good Law
127 Cal. App. 4th 274·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 316·2005 Daily Journal DAR 2485·25 Cal. Rptr. 3d 448·70 Cal. Comp. Cases 133
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 2, 2005No. B177466California5,791 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Zelon, J.

INTRODUCTION

Petitioner, Gregory Kleemann, claimed industrial injuries from work as a special agent for respondent, State of California. After his claim was tried and submitted to the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) for a decision, the Legislature enacted Senate Bill No. 899 (2003-2004 Reg. Sess.) (Bill 899) and required apportionment based on causation under new Labor Code sections 4663 and 4664.

The WCJ vacated submission to address the new apportionment requirements. Kleemann petitioned respondent, Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB), for a ruling that new Labor Code sections 4663 and 4664 did not apply but the WCAB remanded to the WCJ for a final decision.

Kleemann contends before this court that new Labor Code sections 4663 and 4664 are inapplicable, since his injuries preceded enactment of Bill 899 and the Legislature did not intend, and could not legally require, retroactive application of those provisions. We conclude that the Legislature intended new Labor Code sections 4663 and 4664 to apply to pending cases such as Kleemann’s, prospectively from the date of enactment of Bill 899, regardless of the date of injury. Accordingly, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.