Cummins

People v. Cummins

Good Law
127 Cal. App. 4th 667·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 375·2005 Daily Journal DAR 3149·25 Cal. Rptr. 3d 860·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2270
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 16, 2005No. B169295California6,082 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Suzukawa, J.

INTRODUCTION

After a jury trial, Donald Cummins was convicted of kidnapping during the commission of a carjacking (count 2) (Pen. Code, § 209.5, subd. (a)), 1 carjacking of a motor vehicle (count 3) (§ 215, subd. (a)), second degree robbery (count 4) (§§ 211, 212.5), five counts of burglary (counts 5-9) *670 (§ 459), and unlawful driving or taking of a vehicle (count 10) (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a)).

Cummins was sentenced to a determinate term as follows. The court imposed the upper term of five years for the robbery in count 4 and a consecutive term of eight months for each of the burglary charges in counts 5 through 9. Cummins received a consecutive indeterminate term of life with the possibility of parole for the kidnapping charge in count 2. The sentences on counts 3 and 10 were stayed pursuant to section 654. This resulted in an aggregate term of life plus eight years and four months in state prison.

In a separate trial, Joseph Kelly was convicted of attempted premeditated murder (count 1) (§§ 664, 187, subd. (a)), kidnapping during the commission of a carjacking (count 2) (§ 209.5, subd. (a)), carjacking of a motor vehicle (count 3) (§ 215, subd. (a)), second…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.