Ricki J. v. Superior Court

Good Law
128 Cal. App. 4th 783·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 624·2005 Daily Journal DAR 4587·27 Cal. Rptr. 3d 494·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3419
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 21, 2005No. C047588California687 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Cantilsakauye, J.

Ricki J. (the minor) appeals from the order of the juvenile court placing her on six months’ informal supervision pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 654.2. 1 The minor claims the juvenile court erroneously denied her motion to dismiss, which alleged a violation of her speedy trial rights, and erred in requiring her to admit the petition before placing her on informal supervision under section 654.2. Respondent contends the minor’s speedy trial claims are not cognizable on appeal after her admission to the petition, but recognizing the minor conditioned her admission on preserving the speedy trial issues for appeal, suggests we remand for her to move to withdraw her admission. The minor, in her reply brief, argues her speedy trial claims are cognizable on appeal. Alternatively, she asks us to treat her appeal as a petition for an extraordinary writ to reach the merits of her speedy trial claims. She also asks this court to strike her admission.

We conclude the juvenile court order of informal supervision is not an appealable judgment or order. Rather than dismissing the appeal, however, we issued a Palma notice (Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.