Horning

Horning v. Shilberg

Good Law
130 Cal. App. 4th 197·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 949·2005 Daily Journal DAR 7031·29 Cal. Rptr. 3d 717·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5118
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 14, 2005No. D043933California4,423 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Irion, J.

Plaintiff Thomas A. Homing appeals a judgment awarding attorney fees and costs under Civil Code section 1717 to defendant Harold Shilberg as the prevailing party on Homing’s claim for breach of contract to convey real property. Homing contends the trial court was not authorized to modify its orally announced tentative decision. Homing further contends he should have been awarded as damages: (1) a commission of $21,450; (2) resale profits of $205,000; and (3) $43,833 to cover the tax consequences of Shilberg’s breach. Finally, Homing asserts the court abused its discretion in denying him leave to reopen the evidence to prove a previously unclaimed item of damage and in awarding attorney fees to Shilberg. We affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On December 3, 2001, Shilberg entered into a written agreement to sell Homing a multi-unit property at 634-640 Seacoast Drive, Imperial Beach, California, for $715,000. In the standardized, preprinted California Association of Realtors form contract (Contract) prepared by Homing, Shilberg agreed to pay Homing, a licensed real estate broker representing himself, a commission, designated as “compensation for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.