Mejia-Lenares

People v. Mejia-Lenares

Good Law
135 Cal. App. 4th 1437·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 93·2006 Daily Journal DAR 1063·38 Cal. Rptr. 3d 404·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 816
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 2006No. F045355California8,904 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Ardaiz, J.

*1444 Opinion

INTRODUCTION *

On April 21, 2003, an information was filed in Kern County Superior Court, charging appellant Jose Luis Mejia-Lenares with murder involving the use of a knife. (Pen. Code, 1 §§ 187, subd. (a), 12022, subd. (b)(1).) A jury subsequently acquitted him of first degree murder, but convicted him of second degree murder and found the knife use allegation to be true. The jury further found him to have been sane at the time he committed the offense. He was sentenced to prison for 15 years to life, enhanced by one year for the knife use, and filed a timely notice of appeal.

In the published portion of this opinion, we hold that so-called imperfect self-defense cannot be based on delusion alone; hence, the trial court did not err in rejecting appellant’s requested modification of CALJIC No. 8.73.1. In the unpublished portion of the opinion, we reject appellant’s claims of evidentiary error. Accordingly, for the reasons which follow, we affirm the judgment.

FACTS*

DISCUSSION

I*

IMPERFECT SELF-DEFENSE BASED ON DELUSION

As described at length in an unpublished portion of this opinion, appellant presented evidence that he fatally stabbed Harry Howard out of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.