Huff

Huff v. Wilkins

Good Law
138 Cal. App. 4th 732·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 528·2006 Daily Journal DAR 4449·41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 754·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3124
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 14, 2006No. D044895California5,023 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

McConnell, J.

In Distefano v. Forester (2001) 85 Cal.App.4th 1249, 1254 [ 102 Cal.Rptr.2d 813 ] (Distefano), this court held the primary assumption of risk doctrine the Supreme Court articulated in Knight v. Jewett (1992) 3 Cal.4th 296 [ 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 2 , 834 P.2d 696 ] (Knight), applies to the sport of “off-roading.” The issue in this case is whether the doctrine bars a tort action arising from an off-roading collision in which the 14-year-old operator of an all-terrain vehicle (ATV) was driving in violation of Vehicle Code section 38503, a safety regulation that prohibits a person under 18 years of age from operating an ATV on public land without adult supervision or a prescribed safety training program, and a companion Bureau of Land Management (BLM) safety rule.

*736 We reverse a summary judgment for defendants. We conclude this violation of safety regulations is not within the range of activities ordinarily involved in the sport of off-roading, and to the extent the violation increased the inherent risk of a collision, plaintiff did not assume the increased risk merely by participating in the sport. It was defendants’ burden to establish the violation did not increase the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.