Paulus

Paulus v. Bob Lynch Ford, Inc.

Good Law
139 Cal. App. 4th 659·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 730·2006 Daily Journal DAR 5996·43 Cal. Rptr. 3d 148·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4126
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 17, 2006No. H028629California10,846 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Duffy, J.

In an earlier lawsuit brought in 2003 (the prior suit), Timothy Paulus was sued by his competitor in an unsuccessful attempt to prevent him from developing a Ford automobile dealership in Morgan Hill, California. That prior suit was brought under Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq. (the unfair competition law (UCL)) 1 by an established, Gilroy-based Ford automobile dealership and its president/shareholder (Bob Lynch Ford, Inc., and Scott Lynch, respectively, and hereafter, collectively, Lynch). 2 After filing a series of demurrers, Paulus ultimately prevailed in the prior suit after the court sustained his demurrer without leave to amend.

In September 2004, Paulus brought this action against Lynch for claims arising out of the prior suit, including a cause of action for malicious prosecution. Lynch brought a special motion to strike Paulus’s complaint under the anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute, Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. 3 After granting the motion, the court awarded Lynch $40,000 and $1,819.96 in attorney fees and costs, respectively.

Paulus appeals from these two orders. He claims (among other things)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.