Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Alex C.

Good Law
141 Cal. App. 4th 845·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1146·2006 Daily Journal DAR 9727·46 Cal. Rptr. 3d 434·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6799
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 25, 2006Nos. B186442, B188355California913 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Cooper, J.

We reverse the juvenile court’s order terminating Alex C.’s parental rights over his daughter Gladys L. Before a juvenile court may terminate a presumed father’s parental rights over his child, the juvenile court must find by clear and convincing evidence that the presumed father is unfit. Here, it was neither alleged nor proven that Alex was an unfit parent.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Gladys and her two siblings became dependants of the juvenile court while they were in the custody of their mother, who is not a party to this appeal. Gladys’s father, Alex C., appeared at the detention hearing in August 2002 and submitted to the court’s jurisdiction. He was represented by counsel. The juvenile court found him to be Gladys’s presumed father. Alex was a nonoffending parent, but at the detention hearing the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) warned that it might amend the Welfare and Institutions Code 1 section 300 petition to name him. The court refused to make “anticipatory orders,” without any petition alleging that Alex either abused or neglected Gladys.

Alex then disappeared. In his three-year absence, Alex did not request…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.