California Teachers Ass'n v. Vallejo City Unified School District

Good Law
149 Cal. App. 4th 135·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 469·2007 Daily Journal DAR 4251·56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 712·2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3370
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 29, 2007No. A110721California7,434 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

McGuiness, J.

This appeal raises two interrelated questions: May teachers who serve under provisional credentials be classified as “probationary” for purposes of the Education Code? 1 And, if so, are such provisionally credentialed teachers entitled to the statutory layoff rights the Code provides to fully credentialed probationary teachers?

As part of a districtwide reduction in work force, on March 11, 2004, the Vallejo City Unified School District (District) sent a letter to 214 certificated employees—i.e., teachers (see § 44831; Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School Dist. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 911, 917 [ 129 Cal.Rptr.2d 811 , 62 P.3d 54 ] (Kavanaugh))—notifying them of impending layoffs and advising them of their right to request a hearing to determine if the District’s decision to terminate their employment was supported by cause. After calculating exactly how many positions it needed to eliminate, the District sent a letter to many teachers rescinding the prior notice and stating their employment would not be terminated after all. At the same time, on April 12, 2004, the District sent a letter to 43 teachers that rescinded the prior layoff notice but nevertheless…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.