Wimsatt

Wimsatt v. Superior Court

Good Law
152 Cal. App. 4th 137·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 996·61 Cal. Rptr. 3d 200·32 A.L.R. 6th 741
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 18, 2007No. B196903California9,131 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Aldrich, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff and real party in interest Corey Kausch (Kausch) filed this legal malpractice case against defendants and petitioners Magaña, Cathcart & McCarthy and Attorney William H. Wimsatt concerning legal representation rendered in a personal injury lawsuit. 1 Among other allegations, Kausch alleged Magaña breached its fiduciary duty by submitting an unauthorized settlement demand to the opposing party. Kausch learned of this potentially unauthorized act from a “confidential mediation brief’ submitted to a mediator in the personal injury lawsuit.

Magaña seeks a writ of mandate compelling the trial court to vacate its order denying Magana’s application for a protective order and, instead, to enter an order that will protect “mediation-related” communications. Magaña *142 contends that the following items may not be disclosed: (1) all mediation briefs; (2) e-mails sent the day before the mediation that quoted from a mediation brief; and (3) a communication made by Wimsatt to the personal injury defendants purportedly lowering Kausch’s settlement demand. (Evid. Code, § 1115 et seq.)

In addressing these evidentiary issues, we examine the mediation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.