Ruelas

Ruelas v. Hernandez

Good Law
154 Cal. App. 4th 339
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 20, 2007No. B191655California2,283 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Flier, J.

Respondents Stanley Hernandez and Isabel Hernandez (hereinafter sometimes collectively the Hernandezes) filed an action seeking to quiet *341 title to a condominium in which they reside. Michelle Ruelas (not a party to this appeal) and appellant Rafael Ruelas were named defendants in the action. The trial court held for the Hernandezes after a bench trial. Rafael Ruelas appeals from the judgment, which we affirm.

FACTS

Michelle Ruelas is the Hernandezes’ daughter; she married appellant in 1997 and they were separated in 2002.

In March 1996 the Hernandezes entered into a lease with Kathleen Dell (not a party hereto) for a condominium located in Reseda. The lease included an option to purchase the condominium. The Hernandezes paid $3,300 for the option and agreed to pay $300 per month to maintain the option in addition to $900 in monthly rent.

The condominium was sold to the Hernandezes under the terms of the option agreement 1 in 1998 for $94,100. The loan that financed the sale, however, was obtained by Michelle, 2 who was the named borrower. Michelle took title to the condominium as “Michelle Hernandez, single woman” in January 1999, while she was still married and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.