Cavalli

Cavalli v. Cavalli

Good Law
169 Cal. App. 4th 684
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 22, 2008No. B203254California6,828 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Turner, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

In these consolidated appeals, plaintiff, Kevin Cavalli, appeals from a judgment dismissing his civil complaint and an order denying his first amended Probate Code 1 section 17200 petition. We reverse the judgment and the order.

II. BACKGROUND

These appeals concern two testamentary trusts—a qualified terminable interest property trust (the QTIP Trust), and a grandchildren’s trust—created under the will of plaintiff’s grandfather, Thomas C. Bowles. Plaintiff is a remainder beneficiary of the QTIP Trust and a beneficiary of the Grandchildren’s Trust. Plaintiffs father is defendant, Richard Alan Cavalli, who also is a beneficiary of the QTIP Trust. Defendant, Walter Henry Reid, is not a beneficiary of either trust. But Mr. Reid is alleged to have induced the trustee, Mary J. Bowles, to sell QTIP Trust property to him at less than fair market value. Mr. Reid allegedly acted with knowledge the transactions breached the trustee’s fiduciary duties.

*689 Mr. Bowles died in 1988. The probate court appointed his surviving spouse, Ms. Bowles, as trustee of the QTIP Trust. The trustee of the QTIP Trust was to pay the net income of the trust to Ms. Bowles during…

concurrence Opinion

Mosk, J.

I concur.

In the first amended petition pursuant to Probate Code section 17200, which petition was before the court in the separate civil action, Kevin Cavalli alleges that the successor trustee of the QTIP Trust, First Regional Bank, “has taken the position in this proceeding that it is a ‘neutral shareholder’ with no duty to investigate the actions of MARY J. BOWLES, the predecessor trustee, or to bring the claims alleged in this petition. Petitioner is further informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, any demand made by Petitioner on First Regional Bank to bring the claims set forth in this petition would have been rejected and would have been futile.” It is alleged there is no acting trustee for the grandchildrens’ trust. It does appear, however, that thereafter First Regional Bank requested instructions whether it should pursue litigation against the trust beneficiary. Nevertheless, we deal with the sufficiency of the first amended petition in the probate proceeding and the complaint in the civil action.

The text authorities provide that a beneficiary of a trust cannot bring an action against a third person unless the successor trustee refuses to sue or is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.