Anderson

Anderson v. Tinsley

Good Law
170 Cal. App. 4th 902·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 90·88 Cal. Rptr. 3d 502
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 2009No. B200639California1,856 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Gilbert, J.

In probate matters, justice can be illusive if not absent. In Estate of Shellenbarger (2008) 169 Cal.App.4th 894 [ 86 Cal.Rptr.3d 862 ], we acknowledged our obligation to follow the law of succession even when we believed to do so was unfair. We had no choice in light of our Supreme Court’s admonition that it is vain for the courts to argue against the injustice of statutory rules governing the law of succession. (Estate of De Cigaran (1907) 150 Cal. 682, 688 [ 89 P. 833 ].)

But in the case we decide here, the Probate Code itself gives the probate judge discretion to reach a fair result. A good deed finds its reward, not its punishment.

*905 Carol Anderson, trustee of the Gertrude Will Revocable Trust, appeals an order determining that Gertrude Will is not an omitted spouse in the trust or estate of decedent Ted Will. (Estate of Gagnier (1993) 21 Cal.App.4th 124, 128-129 [ 26 Cal.Rptr.2d 128 ]; Prob. Code, § 140 et seq.) 1 We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 2

On April 13, 1980, Ted Will executed a will and trust, declaring that he was divorced and had five children, including respondent Lori Tinsley. Many years later, Ted became reacquainted with his high school…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.