Sacramento County Department of Health & Human Services v. Julie G.

Good Law
170 Cal. App. 4th 1530
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 2009No. C059277California818 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Scotland, J.

*1532 Opinion

Julie G. (appellant), mother of E.G. (the minor), appeals from juvenile court orders terminating appellant’s parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 366.26, 395; further section references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code unless otherwise specified.) She claims reversal is required because there was a failure to give Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA) notice to all identified tribes. ( 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) We shall affirm the orders.

As we will explain, until biological parentage is established, an alleged father’s claim of Indian heritage does not trigger the requirement of ICWA notice because, absent a biological connection, the minor cannot claim Indian heritage through the alleged father. Here, a paternity test established that the alleged father was not the biological father of the minor. Therefore, ICWA notice was not required.

FACTS

The newborn minor was detained in March 2007 due to appellant’s substance abuse problem, exemplified by positive drug tests for both appellant and the minor when the minor was bom and by appellant’s admission of recent drag use. The detention report identified two alleged fathers, A.J. and C.H., for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.