Harris

Harris v. Harris

Good Law
173 Cal. App. 4th 119
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 20, 2009No. C055832California5,630 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Nicholson, J.

Although this is an appeal from an order of the probate court, it relates to three different actions; (1) the probate action, (2) a negligence action against the administrator of the estate of the deceased, and (3) a bad faith action against Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company for refusing to defend the administrator in the negligence action and indemnify the administrator for the judgment in the negligence action. Travelers seeks to assert, as a defense in the bad faith action, that the failure of plaintiffs in the negligence action to file a timely claim with the estate barred relief in that action and recovery against Travelers in the bad faith action. The court in the bad faith action referred the question to the probate court, and the probate court held that Travelers is estopped from asserting that no timely claim was filed. Travelers appeals from the probate court order.

We affirm. We conclude that (1) Travelers had standing to appear in the probate action, (2) Travelers is estopped from asserting that the failure of plaintiffs in the negligence action to file a timely probate claim bars relief against Travelers in the bad faith action, and (3)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.