Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Martin O.

Appellant Martin O. is the alleged father of J.O. (J.O.I), a 17-year-old girl, B.O., a 16-year-old boy, and J.O.II, a 14-year-old boy (collectively, the O children or the children). 1 Appellant contends the trial court erred in ruling he was not the children’s presumed father and in making jurisdictional findings under Welfare and Institutions Code, section 300, subdivisions (b) and (g) based on appellant’s failure to provide support for many years. 2 Appellant further contends the court failed to properly comply with the procedures of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 ( 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.; ICWA). We conclude the court erred in ruling that appellant was not the O children’s presumed father. However, the court’s jurisdictional finding under section 300, subdivision (g) was supported by substantial evidence and is affirmed. We remand for entry of an order declaring appellant the presumed father and for compliance with ICWA procedures.

*144 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The O children were detained, along with their three half siblings, in June 2008 as a result of the alleged physical and sexual abuse of J.O.I. 3 The court sustained findings under section 300,…