Gallego

People v. Gallego

Good Law
117 Cal. Rptr. 3d 907·190 Cal. App. 4th 388·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1992·10 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 14
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 22, 2010No. C061749California3,750 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Butz, J.

*390 Opinion

A jury acquitted defendant Rolando N. Gallego of first degree murder but convicted him of a 1991 second degree murder and found he used a knife to commit it. (Pen. Code, former §§ 187, 12022, subd. (b)(1).) 1

Sentenced to a state prison term of 16 years to life, defendant appeals. He contends (1) DNA 2 testing should be deemed a constitutionally protected “search,” regardless of the source of the tested material; and, the trial court (2) coerced a guilty verdict after a second deadlock and abused its discretion in denying the release of juror information; (3) erroneously instructed on an alleged false statement from him; (4) erroneously admitted hearsay evidence and excluded his polygraph willingness; and (5) erred regarding presentence conduct credit and a parole revocation fine.

We agree with defendant’s last contention regarding presentence conduct credit and the parole revocation fine, but disagree with his remaining claims. Of note, we conclude that a cigarette butt that defendant voluntarily discarded by tossing it onto a public sidewalk, which was then collected and DNA tested by law enforcement only to identify defendant as a suspect in an ongoing criminal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.