Schuman

Schuman v. Ignatin

Good Law
119 Cal. Rptr. 3d 318·191 Cal. App. 4th 255·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 2154
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 23, 2010No. B215059California4,880 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Willhite, J.

This case involves a dispute among property owners in a general plan development of 68 homes in Los Angeles. The *257 owners of one of the properties, Allan Ignatin and Janet Sobell (collectively, Ignatin), 1 want to build a house that other property owners believe would violate recorded restrictions (conditions, covenants and restrictions (CC&R’s)) governing the development. The owners of a neighboring property, Philip Schuman and Margaret McNulty (collectively, Schuman), filed a lawsuit against Ignatin, seeking to block the proposed construction. Ignatin cross-complained against Schuman and several other property owners, including Eric F. Edmunds, Jr., and Debora Edmunds (collectively, Edmunds), seeking a determination that the proposed house would not violate the CC&R’s. Edmunds, in turn, filed a cross-complaint against Ignatin, alleging that the proposed house would violate the CC&R’s, create a nuisance, and violate city codes and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.).

During a recess after the first day of a bench trial, Ignatin for the first time challenged the validity of a recorded amendment that purportedly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.