Cobb

Cobb v. City of Stockton

Good Law
120 Cal. Rptr. 3d 389·192 Cal. App. 4th 65·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 87
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 2011No. C062328California2,986 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hull, J.

*67 Opinion

Nine years after the City of Stockton (City) initiated eminent domain proceedings to acquire real property owned by Andrew C. Cobb, as trustee of the Andrew C. Cobb 1992 Revocable Trust (the Trust), and after the City constructed a public roadway across the condemned property, the trial court dismissed the action for lack of prosecution (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.360). Plaintiff, Michael A. Cobb, as successor trustee, then initiated this action in inverse condemnation to collect for the taking of the property by virtue of the extant roadway.

The City demurred to the complaint, arguing the inverse condemnation claim is time-barred, inasmuch as the taking occurred more than five years before the complaint was filed. The trial court agreed, sustained the demurrers without leave to amend, and entered judgment for the City. Plaintiff appeals.

We conclude the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer based on the statute of limitations. Plaintiff’s claim for inverse condemnation did not accrue until the City’s occupation of the property became wrongful, which did not occur until the eminent domain proceeding was dismissed. We therefore reverse.

Facts and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.