Heritage Residential Care, Inc. v. Division of Labor Standards Enforcement

Good Law
120 Cal. Rptr. 3d 363·192 Cal. App. 4th 75·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 83·17 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 269
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 2011No. H034994California4,651 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McAdams, J.

*78 Opinion

At issue in this appeal is a civil penalty, assessed under Labor Code section 226.3, for appellant’s failure to provide itemized wage statements to all of its employees as statutorily required. Appellant unsuccessfully challenged the penalty below, first at an administrative hearing and later in the trial court, arguing that its noncompliance was inadvertent within the meaning of the statute and that respondent erred in determining otherwise. Appellant renews those arguments here.

Interpreting the pertinent statutory language as a matter of first impression, we conclude that the statute’s references to “inadvertent” violations offer no grounds for setting aside the penalty assessed against appellant. We therefore affirm the judgment.

BACKGROUND

The parties to this appeal are Heritage Residential Care, Inc. (appellant), and the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (respondent, sometimes referred to herein as DLSE or Labor Commissioner). The facts, which are undisputed, are taken from the findings in respondent’s administrative decision.

Appellant’s Business Operation

Appellant operates seven residential care facilities. During the relevant time period,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.