Bologna

Bologna v. City & County of San Francisco

Good Law
121 Cal. Rptr. 3d 406·192 Cal. App. 4th 429·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 116·2011 WL 286229
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 2011No. A128398California4,043 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Siggins, J.

*432 Opinion

This case arises from the tragic and senseless killings of Anthony Bologna and his sons Michael and Matthew, who were stopped in traffic in San Francisco when Edwin Ramos, an illegal immigrant, allegedly shot and killed them. Plaintiffs Danielle, Andrew, and Francesca Bologna are decedents’ survivors and next of kin, and appeal from a judgment entered after the trial court sustained the demurrer of defendants the City and County of San Francisco, Gavin Newsom, Heather Fong, and William Sifferman (jointly, the City) without leave to amend. The narrow question posed in this appeal is whether the surviving family members can proceed in tort against the City under a theory that San Francisco’s policy to provide sanctuary to illegal immigrants was a legal cause of decedents’ murders because it shielded Ramos from deportation in violation of state and federal statutes. We conclude, as did the trial court, that the alleged breaches of those statutes support neither a legally viable claim of negligence per se under Evidence Code section 669 nor breach of mandatory duties under Government Code section 815.6. We therefore affirm the judgment.

BACKGROUND

The trial court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.