Safaie

Safaie v. Jacuzzi Whirlpool Bath, Inc.

Good Law
122 Cal. Rptr. 3d 344·192 Cal. App. 4th 1160·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 189·2011 D.A.R. 2734
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 2011No. D055896California5,083 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haller, J.

*1164 Opinion

Shahrokh Doctor Safaie appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to recertify a class of individuals who purchased whirlpool bathtubs from defendants Jacuzzi Whirlpool Bath, Inc., and Jacuzzi, Inc. (collectively Jacuzzi). Although the order denying recertification is not appealable, we shall exercise our discretion to treat the appeal as a writ petition. In so doing, we determine the court did not err in denying Safaie’s motion. The trial court’s prior June 2007 ruling decertifying the class, affirmed on appeal in November 2008, barred Safaie from a second opportunity to seek class certification.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

In September 2004, Safaie filed a class action complaint against Jacuzzi alleging Jacuzzi made representations in its brochures, marketing materials, and advertisements that certain models of its whirlpool bathtubs had two- or three-horsepower motors, when in fact the tubs had less horsepower. Safaie alleged the misrepresentations constituted fraud and a breach of warranty and violated several consumer protection statutes, including the unfair competition law and the false advertising law. 2 (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 17200 et…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.