Wherry

Wherry v. Award, Inc.

Good Law
123 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1·192 Cal. App. 4th 1242·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 199
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 2011No. G042404California2,449 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Rylaarsdam, J.

Defendants Award, Inc., Award-Superstars, Century 21 Superstars and Gregory Britton appeal from an order denying their petition to arbitrate the complaint for gender discrimination and sexual harassment filed by plaintiffs Karena Wherry and Rocelyn Traieh. Defendants assert the petition should have been granted for a variety of reasons, including that in the contract executed by the parties they agreed to arbitrate all disputes, including those under FEHA (California Fair Employment and Housing Act; Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.), and the terms of arbitration were not unconscionable. We determine the arbitration provisions were unconscionable and therefore unenforceable and affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In mid-2006 each plaintiff entered into an independent contractor agreement (agreement) with defendant Award, Inc., to act as a salesperson; defendant Britton signed the contracts as the office manager. Both agreements contain an arbitration provision, which states, “All disputes or claims between [plaintiff] and other licensee(s) associated with [defendant], or between [plaintiff] and [defendant] arising from or connected in any way with this [agreement, which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.