Larson

Larson v. City & County of San Francisco

Bad Law
123 Cal. Rptr. 3d 40·192 Cal. App. 4th 1263·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 200
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 2011No. A125887California14,037 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Banke, J.

I. Introduction

Appellants Norman T. Larson, San Francisco Apartment Association, San Francisco Association of Realtors, Coalition for Better Housing, Round Hill Pacific, and John Zanghi (appellants) challenge provisions of Proposition M, a voter-approved initiative amending San Francisco’s Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance (hereafter, the Rent Ordinance). Proposition M augmented the antiharassment provisions of the ordinance by *1272 expanding the definition of “decrease in [housing] services” to include a list of “bad faith” acts by landlords and their agents—ranging from violating any state or local antidiscrimination law, to failing to cash a rent check within 30 days, to interfering with a tenant’s right to privacy. Upon finding any such harassment and thereby a “decrease in [housing] services,” the San Francisco Rent Board (Board) can order a reduction in rent. By how much and for how long is not specified in the proposition, nor are any criteria provided for making such determinations. Proposition M also added an attorney fees provision to the Rent Ordinance, mandating an award of fees to a prevailing tenant in an unlawful detainer case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.