Brown

California School Boards Ass'n v. Brown

Good Law
122 Cal. Rptr. 3d 674·192 Cal. App. 4th 1507·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 214
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 2011No. B228680California7,186 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Croskey, J.

Under California Constitution, article XIII B, section 6, subdivision (a), whenever the state mandates a new program or higher level of service upon a local government, the state is required to provide a subvention of funds to reimburse the local government for the costs of the mandated program or increased service. In this case, we are concerned with a mandated program for which the state is several hundred million dollars in arrears in its payments to local governments. In November 2004, the voters approved Proposition 1A, which added to section 6 of article XIII B a provision requiring that the state begin reimbursing local governments for the amounts due. (Cal. Const., art. XHI B, § 6, subd. (b).) Under that provision, in each year, for each unreimbursed mandate, the Legislature is required to either (1) appropriate, in the annual budget act (Budget Act), the full amount due that year toward repaying the local governments for the unreimbursed mandate; or (2) suspend the operation of the mandate. (Cal. Const., art. XIIIB, § 6, subd. (b)(1).) In the instant case, we are concerned with a mandate for which the Legislature appropriated the required amount in the budget…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.