State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lee

Good Law
122 Cal. Rptr. 3d 183·193 Cal. App. 4th 34·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 219
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 2011No. C062380California2,267 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nicholson, J.

After State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company filed an unfair business practices action against Fue Lee and others, Lee and the others filed a cross-complaint against State Farm and its law firm, alleging abuse of process and unfair business practices based on questions asked by State Farm’s attorney during depositions in a prior action for recovery of medical expenses. The deposition questions revealed the cross-complainants’ possible illegal ownership of chiropractic practices by a partnership between a chiropractor and a layperson. State Farm brought an anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) motion against the cross-complaint, and Lee sought disqualification of State Farm’s law firm and a preliminary injunction against use of the information revealed in the depositions. The trial court granted State Farm’s anti-SLAPP motion and denied Lee’s motion to disqualify and for injunctive relief.

On appeal, Lee contends the trial court erred in granting the anti-SLAPP motion. The contention is without merit because Lee failed to establish a probability of prevailing on the merits.

Lee also contends the trial court erred in denying injunctive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.