McCormick

McCormick v. County of Alameda

Good Law
122 Cal. Rptr. 3d 505·193 Cal. App. 4th 201·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 233
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 2, 2011No. A126818California6,453 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kline, J.

*206 Opinion

This appeal is from the denial of a petition for writ of mandate challenging Alameda County’s denial of general assistance to minor Dajohn McCormick on the basis that he qualified for and received benefits, although not cash aid, from the CalWORKs (California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids) program. Appellants contend Dajohn was entitled to support from general assistance because his circumstances did not fall within any of the exceptions to the requirement that general assistance “relieve and support” all otherwise unsupported indigent residents and he was not “relieved and supported” by CalWORKs or any other program. We conclude Dajohn was improperly denied eligibility for general assistance and reverse.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS

Prior to January 2008, Dajohn’s mother, Drusilla Zeno, received a monthly cash grant of $398 for her son Derrick under the CalWORKs program. The CalWORKs household consisted of Zeno, Derrick (then 13 years old), and Dajohn (then seven years old). Dajohn was receiving food stamps and Medi-Cal but, under the statutorily defined maximum family grant (MFG) rule, was not entitled to cash aid because his family had been…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.