Ehp Glendale, LLC v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
122 Cal. Rptr. 3d 378·193 Cal. App. 4th 262·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 237
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 2011No. B217036California5,558 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Flier, J.

The County of Los Angeles (County) appeals from the grant of summary judgment to EHP Glendale, LLC, and Eagle Hospitality Properties Trust, Inc. (Eagle), on Eagle’s action for a property tax refund. The County contends the trial court erred in ruling as a matter of law that the Los Angeles County Assessor (assessor) and the Los Angeles County Assessment Appeals Board (Board) used the wrong methodology in appraising the Glendale Hilton Hotel (hotel or property) after its purchase by Eagle. In turn, Eagle cross-appeals from the trial court order denying its motion for attorney fees.

We hold that the trial court erred in granting a summary judgment on an incomplete record, and, in any case, the record establishes there are triable issues of material fact. For the reasons explained below, the judgment must be reversed and the case remanded for trial.

FACTS

1. The Subject Property

The property at issue is located near the intersection of Brand Boulevard and Glenoaks Boulevard in the City of Glendale (City). The 18-story structure, built in 1991, is operated as a full-service first-class hotel with 351 guestrooms, including 13 suites. The hotel encompasses about 285,000…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.