Kington

Kington v. Fong

Good Law
123 Cal. Rptr. 3d 260·193 Cal. App. 4th 278
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 3, 2011No. B217038California6,659 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Croskey, J.

Gary Fong appeals an order imposing $200,000 in monetary sanctions against him under Family Code section 2107, subdivision (c) 1 for failure to comply with his disclosure obligations and imposing an additional $100,000 in attorney fees and costs under section 271. He contends Marci Kington is not entitled to an award of monetary sanctions under section 2107, subdivision (c) as a matter of law because she failed to comply with her disclosure obligations. He also contends the trial court failed to consider his ability to pay in awarding attorney fees and costs under section 271, challenges the awards on other grounds, and also contends the failure to issue a statement of decision was reversible error.

We conclude that Marci is not entitled to an award of monetary sanctions under section 2107, subdivision (c) because the statute only authorizes an award in favor of a “complying party,” and Marci was not a complying party at the time of her motion because she had failed to comply with her own disclosure obligations. We also conclude that Gary has shown no error in the award of attorney fees and costs under section 271 and that no statement of decision was required. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.