Behr

Behr v. Redmond

Caution
123 Cal. Rptr. 3d 97·193 Cal. App. 4th 517·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 277
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 2, 2011No. E048333California8,250 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

King, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff and respondent Patricia Behr sued defendant and appellant Thomas Redmond for damages arising from the alleged tortious transmission of genital herpes. By special verdict, the jury made findings favorable to Behr and found that she had suffered compensatory damages of $4,003,600, including $2.5 million for future medical expenses. In a separate trial, the jury found that Behr was entitled to punitive damages in the amount of $2.75 million.

On appeal, Redmond contends (1) the evidence is insufficient to support a finding that Behr contracted the herpes virus from sexual contact with him prior to his disclosure of the disease, and that he cannot be liable for transmitting the disease after his disclosure; (2) the special verdict is fatally defective for failing to include findings as to the timing of Behr’s infection, the existence of a special relationship between the parties for purposes of establishing negligent infliction of emotional distress, and any misrepresentation by Redmond; (3) the compensatory and punitive damages awards are excessive; and (4) the court erred in denying his motion to strike Behr’s postjudgment request for expert…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.