Coronado Cays Homeowners Ass'n v. City of Coronado

Good Law
123 Cal. Rptr. 3d 90·193 Cal. App. 4th 602·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 296
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 2011No. D056377California3,019 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McConnell, J.

*605 Opinion

City of Coronado (the City) appeals a judgment in which the court determined the City, rather than Coronado Cays Homeowners Association (the Association), 1 is responsible for maintaining a berm that laterally supports bulkheads located on property within the Coronado Cays subdivision. The bulkheads are adjacent to and act as a retaining wall for a waterway that belongs to the City, over which the Association has an easement. The City contends the court erred by granting the Association declaratory relief as there was no actual controversy between the parties; misinterpreting the operative documents, a special use permit and an assessor’s parcel map; and not including in the judgment certain information included in the statement of decision. We find all contentions lack merit and affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1967 the City sold property to Atlantic Richfield Company and Cedric Sanders (together the developer) for the development of a “marina type residential planned community . . . development” called Coronado Cays. The contract required the developer to obtain a special use permit (SUP).

Under the 1968 SUP, the developer installed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.