People v. Superior Court

Good Law
122 Cal. Rptr. 3d 625·193 Cal. App. 4th 989·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 336
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 24, 2011No. B229701California1,166 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Epstein, J.

*991 Opinion

The People petition for a writ of mandate to vacate the trial court’s October 28, 2010 order granting Ronald Brim’s motion for a separate penalty jury in a capital murder case. The People contend the trial court abused its discretion under Penal Code section 190.4, subdivision (c). We agree and grant the petition, directing the trial court to vacate its order and issue a new order denying Brim’s motion.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

Brim and his codefendant Richard Roberson were jointly charged with committing two murders and three attempted murders on September 23, 2008, during a gang-related shooting at the Compton Blue Line train station. Brim was charged separately with being a felon in possession of a firearm. The People are seeking the death penalty for Brim. Brim moved for separate guilt and penalty trials or the empanelment of separate juries in order to voir dire prospective jurors in the guilt and penalty phases differently. On October 28, 2010, the trial court granted the motion for a separate penalty jury not for the reasons advanced by Brim, but because it would take the defense more than a year to investigate 17 alleged prior incidents in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.