Schlimbach

People v. Schlimbach

Good Law
122 Cal. Rptr. 3d 804·193 Cal. App. 4th 1132·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 353
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 25, 2011No. B219247California6,754 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Croskey, J.

Defendant and appellant Gladys Martin Schlimbach operates Le Blanc Café, a restaurant and bar. Between August 2007 and July 2008, Schlimbach’s employees were arrested seven times for selling alcohol to obviously intoxicated patrons, a misdemeanor. As a result of these arrests, on September 10, 2008, the Los Angeles City Attorney, acting on behalf of the People of the State of California, brought this action against Schlimbach 1 to declare her premises a public nuisance under the Unlawful Liquor Sale *1135 Abatement Law (Pen. Code, §§ 11200-11207) and for unlawful business practices (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200). On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court concluded that no triable issues of fact existed and that (1) the bar constituted a nuisance; and (2) unlawful business practices were permitted at the bar. A permanent injunction followed, imposing limits on Schlimbach’s conduct of her business in order to avoid future sales of alcohol to obviously intoxicated persons. Schlimbach was also ordered to pay civil penalties, attorney fees, investigative fees, and court costs. Schlimbach appeals. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The complaint in this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.