Morrison

Morrison v. Vineyard Creek L.P.

Good Law
123 Cal. Rptr. 3d 414·193 Cal. App. 4th 1254·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 363
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 29, 2011No. A127476California7,995 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Needham, J.

Sarah Morrison appeals from a postjudgment order denying her motion for attorney fees under Civil Code section 1942.5 and Government Code section 12989.2 after the parties had resolved their dispute by settlement. We will affirm the order.

*1257 I. Facts and Procedural History

On January 8, 2007, Morrison signed a lease and moved into an apartment at Vineyard Creek Apartments in Santa Rosa, California. The lease agreement provided on the first page, which Morrison initialed, that the apartment would “be used as a private residence and for no other purpose.” Morrison did not disclose her intention to operate a family childcare home in the apartment.

On January 22, 2007, Morrison delivered a “Notice” to respondent Vineyard Creek L.P., pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 1597.40, subdivision (d)(1) of the California Child Day Care Facilities Act (Child Day Care Act). (Health & Saf. Code, § 1596.70 et seq.) In the Notice, Morrison declared her intent to operate a family child daycare facility in her apartment beginning March 1, 2007.

Toward the end of January 2007, after passing the required home inspection, Morrison received her state license to operate a family…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.