Garbell

Garbell v. Hardwoods

Good Law
122 Cal. Rptr. 3d 856·193 Cal. App. 4th 1563·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 389
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 5, 2011No. B221482California3,317 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Aldrich, J.

The smoke from a fire at the Calabasas home of James and Rita Garbell damaged their personal property. For their personal property loss, the Garbells’ insurance company paid the policy limit of $424,050, which covered about half of their loss. The Garbells sued Conejo Hardwoods, Inc., to recover for their uninsured loss, and the Garbells’ insurer sued Conejo Hardwoods in a separate subrogation action to recover what it paid the *1566 Garbells. Workers from Conejo Hardwoods (the workers) 1 were installing hardwood flooring in the Garbells’ house on the day of the fire.

The jury returned a verdict with findings that Conejo Hardwoods negligently caused the fire, attributing 55 percent of the fault to Conejo Hardwoods for the Garbells’ total loss of $822,483.45, resulting in a judgment against Conejo Hardwoods of $452,365.90. The trial court then deducted the insurance payment of $424,050, which was at issue in the subrogation action, leaving a net recovery of $28,315.90.

The Garbells appeal the trial court’s damages calculation, contending the trial court miscalculated comparative fault, but the Garbells’ argument confuses the collateral source rule with the subrogation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.