Mcmackin

Mcmackin v. Ehrheart

Good Law
122 Cal. Rptr. 3d 902·194 Cal. App. 4th 128·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 418
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 8, 2011No. B224723California5,794 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Mallano, J.

*131 Opinion

In a case of first impression, we are asked to determine whether a Marvin claim 1 based on a decedent’s promise to leave her cohabitant a life estate in real property is governed by the one-year statute of limitations of Code of Civil Procedure section 366.3, and, if so, whether the doctrine of equitable estoppel can be applied to preclude assertion of section 366.3’s statute of limitations. 2 We conclude that the Marvin claim here is an action to enforce a claim that arises from a promise or agreement with a decedent for distribution from an estate and, thus, is governed by section 366.3, which requires the action to be commenced within one year after the date of death. We further conclude that, depending on the circumstances of each case, the doctrine of equitable estoppel may be applied to preclude a party from asserting the statute of limitations set forth in section 366.3 as a defense to an untimely action where the party’s wrongdoing has induced another to forbear filing suit.

BACKGROUND

The facts and evidence pertinent to this appeal are taken from the declarations submitted by the parties in connection with the application for injunctive relief. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.