Lawrence

Lawrence v. Hartnell Community College District

Good Law
123 Cal. Rptr. 3d 535·194 Cal. App. 4th 687·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 462·2011 D.A.R. 5599
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 20, 2011No. H035064California5,563 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Mihara, J.

Appellants Gail Lawrence and Sharon Culver sought a writ of administrative mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085) in the trial court to compel their former employer, respondent Hartnell Community College District (the District), to reinstate them as executive assistants to the District’s superintendent/president or alternatively, to conduct hearings on the propriety of their “demotions, involuntary transfers, and terminations.” The court denied the petition, and appellants challenge that decision on appeal.

*691 Appellants contend the court erred when it determined that their temporary reassignments were not “demotions” (Ed. Code, § 88001, subd. (d)), 1 and their eventual separations from employment were not terminations “for cause” (§ 88001, subd. (h)). We reject their contentions.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Appellants were nonunion permanent classified 2 employees of the District who worked as executive assistants to longtime superintendent/president Dr. Edward Valeau. Dr. Valeau resigned at the end of June 2007, and Dr. Phoebe Helm became interim superintendent/president.

She faced a challenging situation: The college was in imminent danger of losing its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.