Arceo

People v. Arceo

Good Law
125 Cal. Rptr. 3d 436·195 Cal. App. 4th 556·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 581
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 13, 2011No. B218758California9,472 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Grimes, J.

SUMMARY

A jury convicted Ernesto Mejorado of three murders and a second jury convicted Gabriel Arceo of two of the murders. Both defendants were also convicted by their respective juries of conspiracy to murder two of the victims. Firearm and gang enhancements, as well as special circumstances allegations of murder while engaged in robbery (in Mejorado’s case), multiple murders and murder of a witness, were found true. The juries could not agree on the death penalty in either case, and defendants were sentenced to consecutive terms of life imprisonment without parole, as well as additional terms of imprisonment for the enhancements.

On appeal, Arceo asserts that the admission of testimony from witnesses who recounted inculpatory statements by Mejorado and another codefendant, who was tried separately, violated his Sixth Amendment right to confront adverse witnesses. In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude there was no Sixth Amendment violation. *

*560 FACTS

1. Overview of the Murders and the Participants

Defendants Arceo and Mejorado were members of a gang, the Krazy Ass Mexicans, as was Francisco Ramirez. Sergio Mejorado, defendant Mejorado’s half…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.