Mealy

Mealy v. B-Mobile, Inc.

Good Law
124 Cal. Rptr. 3d 804·195 Cal. App. 4th 1218·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 633
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 24, 2011No. B226243California2,978 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Croskey, J.

Donald Mealy appeals a defense judgment on his counts against B-Mobile, Inc., and Guldmann, Inc., for loss of consortium and negligent infliction of emotional distress after the granting of a motion for judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 631.8) in a nonjury trial. He contends the trial court’s findings that he suffered no cognizable damages on either count are based on legal error and are not supported by the evidence. We conclude that the evidence compels the conclusion that Donald Mealy suffered a compensable loss of consortium and that the trial court’s finding to the contrary was error. We also conclude that Donald Mealy has shown no error in the denial of relief on his count for negligent infliction of emotional distress. We therefore will affirm the judgment in part and reverse it in part.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

1. Factual Background

Donald Mealy, born in 1925, and Adelaide Mealy, bom in 1927, married in 1951. Adelaide Mealy was stricken with polio in 1952 and suffered almost complete paralysis in both legs. She was confined to a wheelchair after that time, but was able to drive a car and work outside the home. She had five children and worked as a counselor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.