Guzman

People v. Guzman

Good Law
125 Cal. Rptr. 3d 348·195 Cal. App. 4th 1396·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 660
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 27, 2011Nos. F057633, F059101California3,919 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Cornell, J.

A jury convicted appellant Roger Isaac Guzman of violating Harbors and Navigation Code sections 655, subdivision (a), 655.2, and 656.2. 1 Guzman and Thomas Christopher Kirby 2 were the occupants of a motorboat driven by Guzman that struck and severely injured an 11-year-old boy on Shaver Lake in 2006. They did not stop to render assistance but instead continued on to the marina, where they later told deputies they had not been involved in the accident and claimed they had been on the pontoon boat that stopped and rendered assistance. Both Guzman and Kirby had been drinking alcoholic beverages the day of the accident.

Guzman contends his constitutional right against self-incrimination was violated prejudicially by the trial court’s instruction to the jury on the section 656.2 offense, which stated he was required to identify himself to law enforcement officers as the operator of the motorboat that had struck the boy. Guzman argues the error requires reversal of his conviction.

Guzman also claims his constitutional rights were violated when the prosecutor misstated the law in closing argument in the trial by stating that Guzman’s voluntary intoxication could not be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.