Parmar

Parmar v. Board of Equalization

Good Law
126 Cal. Rptr. 3d 405·196 Cal. App. 4th 705·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 734
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 14, 2011No. B215789California6,009 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Perluss, J.

Ashok V. Parmar, Pumima A. Parmar and Mahinder Parmar (collectively the Parmars) sued the State Board of Equalization (Board) for a refund of cigarette and tobacco taxes paid in part by them and in part on their behalf by their closely held corporation, Santos Agency, Inc. (Santos). Following a bench trial, the trial court found the taxes had been unlawfully assessed against the Parmars individually and granted the Parmars’ request for a refund of $69,762.95. The court also awarded the Parmars more than $600,000 in attorney fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, finding the successful litigation had resulted in the enforcement of an important right affecting the public interest.

On appeal the Board primarily contends the Parmars lack standing to recover the taxes paid by Santos on their behalf. We agree. Pursuant to section 30407 of the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Law (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 30001 et seq.), only the party who paid the tax can obtain a refund. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment to the extent it awards the Parmars more money than they actually paid in cigarette and tobacco taxes and affirm it in all other respects.

Both the Board and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.