Sherow

People v. Sherow

Good Law
128 Cal. Rptr. 3d 255·196 Cal. App. 4th 1296·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 837
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 2011No. D056988California5,558 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Irion, J.

Timothy Wayne Sherow' (Sherow, Sr.) and Timothy Wayne Sherow, Jr. (Sherow, Jr.), were charged in the same information.

The charges against Sherow, Sr., were tried to a jury, which found him guilty on nine counts of burglary (Pen. Code, § 459). 1 Sherow, Sr., admitted a *1300 prior strike and eight prior prison terms. (§§ 667.5, subd. (b), 667, subds. (c), (e)(1), 1170.12, subd. (c)(1).) The trial court sentenced Sherow, Sr., to 19 years four months in prison.

Sherow, Jr., pled guilty to 27 counts of burglary (§ 459) and 27 counts of receiving stolen property (§ 496, subd. (a)). The trial court sentenced Sherow, Jr., to six years four months in prison.

Sherow, Sr., contends that (1) the trial court erred in admitting surveillance videos showing him stealing DVD’s from Walmart and Sam’s Club stores; (2) insufficient evidence supports certain of the burglary convictions; and (3) the trial court erred by instructing the jury, with respect to counts 7 through 10, that Sherow, Sr., had the burden to prove a consent defense to burglary by a preponderance of the evidence. We conclude that the third argument has merit. The trial court committed prejudicial instructional error…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.