Herrera

Herrera v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

Good Law
127 Cal. Rptr. 3d 362·196 Cal. App. 4th 1366·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 877
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 2011No. C065630California4,229 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Murray, J.

SUMMARY

Plaintiffs Robert and Gail Herrera lost their house in South Lake Tahoe to a nonjudicial foreclosure sale. They brought suit to set aside that sale. They challenge whether the parties that conducted the sale, defendants Deutsche 1 *1369 Bank National Trust Company (the Bank) and California Reconveyance Company (CRC), were in fact the beneficiary and trustee, respectively, under a deed of trust secured by their property, and thus had authority to conduct the sale. Plaintiffs also contend that they are entitled to be repaid for the expenses they incurred in repairing and insuring the property and paying back taxes if defendants are successful in establishing their interest in the property.

Defendants moved for summary judgment. In support of their motion, they requested that the trial court take judicial notice of recorded documents, including an assignment of deed of trust and a substitution of trustee. Defendants asserted that these documents established the authority of the Bank and CRC to conduct the foreclosure sale. Defendants also provided a declaration by a custodian of records for CRC, in which the custodian did not expressly declare that the Bank was the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.