Ni

Ni v. Slocum

Good Law
127 Cal. Rptr. 3d 620·196 Cal. App. 4th 1636·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 862
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 2011No. A128721California7,311 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Margulies, J.

To qualify an initiative measure for the election ballot, its proponents must submit to county elections officials a petition endorsed by *1641 a statutorily specified number of eligible voters. Initiative petition endorsement is ordinarily a pen-and-paper affair. Proponents of a recent initiative to legalize marijuana, however, submitted to respondent Warren Slocum, the chief elections officer of San Mateo County (the County), a digital memory device containing an electronic image of an initiative petition. The petition contained a single signature, that of Michael Ni (hereafter petitioner), which he had inscribed on the electronic image of the petition by tracing it on the screen of his smartphone. Using the same signature, petitioner had also executed the required declaration by the circulator of the petition, attesting to the genuineness of his signature. The County rejected petitioner’s electronic signature, explaining he had not “personally affixed” it to the petition, as required by Elections Code section 100.

Petitioner unsuccessfully sought a writ of mandate requiring the County to accept his electronic signature. We agree with the County that use of an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.