People v. Appellate Division of Superior Court

Good Law
130 Cal. Rptr. 3d 116·197 Cal. App. 4th 985·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 956
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 22, 2011No. B230745California3,246 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Mallano, J.

During pretrial proceedings in a misdemeanor case, the trial court held that the criminal discovery statutes (Pen. Code, § 1054 et seq.) precluded the prosecutor from obtaining production of various corporate records pertaining to corporate structure and operations from the corporate defendants. We conclude that the criminal discovery statutes do not bar production of the records, which constitute a category of nontestimonial evidence that Penal Code section 1054.4 and established precedent permit the prosecutor to obtain. Accordingly, we grant the prosecutor’s petition for a writ of mandate.

*988 BACKGROUND

In a complaint filed June 7, 2010, real parties in interest World Wide Rush, LLC (WWR); SMIII Sepulveda Center, LLC (SMIII); VDA Property Company, LLC (VDA); and MD Graphic Installers, Inc. (real parties in interest), were charged with violating Los Angeles Municipal Code section 57.12.02, Business and Professions Code sections 5405 and 5440, and Los Angeles Municipal Code section 14.4.4, subdivision B.9 (charged against VDA only) by placing “supergraphic” advertising signs on two buildings in Los Angeles (People v. World Wide Rush, LLC (Super. Ct. L.A. County,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.