Rappaport

Rappaport v. Gelfand

Good Law
129 Cal. Rptr. 3d 670·197 Cal. App. 4th 1213·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 982
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 28, 2011No. B213618California7,396 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Croskey, J.

Defendants and appellants Marvin Gelfand (Gelfand), Steven Glaser (Glaser), Gelfand Rappaport & Glaser LLP (GRG) and *1217 Gelfand & Glaser LLP (GG), the successor to GRG, appeal a judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent Jerry Rappaport (Rappaport) following a bench trial to determine the “buyout price” of a dissociating partner’s interest in a law firm pursuant to Corporations Code section 16701, subd. (b). 1 That section is part of the Uniform Partnership Act of 1994 (UPA) (§ 16100 et seq.), which applies to law partnerships.

In this apparent case of first impression in California, we are called upon to construe section 16701, subdivision (b), which provides, “The buyout price of a dissociated partner’s interest is the amount that would have been distributable to the dissociating partner under subdivision (b) of Section 16807 if, on the date of dissociation, the assets of the partnership were sold at a price equal to the greater of the liquidation value or the value based on a sale of the entire business as a going concern without the dissociated partner and the partnership was wound up as of that date. Interest shall be paid from the date of dissociation to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.