Edna Valley Watch v. County of San Luis Obispo

Good Law
129 Cal. Rptr. 3d 249·197 Cal. App. 4th 1312·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 998
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 2, 2011No. B223653California2,782 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Here we hold a party may receive attorney’s fees incurred in an administrative hearing. The trial court denied a portion of appellants’ attorney’s fees requested under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, the private attorney general statute. 1 The court also denied one party’s attorney’s fees incurred in a petition for writ of mandate because of the party’s personal stake in the litigation. We reverse.

Section 1021.5 allows attorney’s fees in administrative proceedings. In addition, a party may not be disqualified from receiving attorney’s fees because of his personal stake in the litigation. (Conservatorship of Whitley (2010) 50 Cal.4th 1206 [ 117 Cal.Rptr.3d 342 , 241 P.3d 840 ].)

FACTS

The Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of San Luis Obispo County (Church) planned to build an 11,000-square-foot church complex in the Edna *1316 Valley area of San Luis Obispo County (County). Philip G. da Silva (da Silva) owns property adjacent to the planned church facility. Edna Valley Watch (Edna) is a nonprofit association.

The County Planning Commission granted the Church a conditional use permit for its project. Da Silva appealed the decision to the Board of Supervisors of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.