Mansur

Mansur v. Ford Motor Co.

Good Law
129 Cal. Rptr. 3d 200·197 Cal. App. 4th 1365·2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 1003
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 5, 2011No. E049411California9,481 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Miller, J.

Plaintiffs and appellants, Mohammad Mansur, individually and as successor in interest for the estate of Omeedeh Mansur, and Arman Mansur and Artemis Mansur, minors (collectively referred to as Plaintiffs), sued Ford Motor Company (Ford) and Drew Ford for (1) strict product liability; (2) negligence; and (3) breach of implied and express warranties. The lawsuit emanated from a fatal car accident. Omeedeh Mansur (Omeedeh) died after the Ford Explorer she was riding in rolled over. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the defense. The trial court awarded Ford and Drew Ford their costs, in the amount of $432,968.03.

Plaintiffs raise three contentions. First, Plaintiffs assert the trial court erred by not instructing the jury on the topic of the “consumer expectations test.” (See Judicial Council of Cal., Civ. Jury Instns. (2011) CACI No. 1203.) Second, Plaintiffs contend the trial court erred by removing Juror No. 10. Third, Plaintiffs assert the trial court erred in several evidentiary rulings. We affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In this part, we provide background facts and facts related to the car accident. Facts related to the specific contentions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.